What this paper found
Research published in Trends in Plant Science highlights that no single species contributes to all ecosystem functions. Maximising multiple ecosystem services simultaneously requires greater species diversity than optimising any single function, because different species drive different processes. For forest carbon projects, this means that biodiverse restoration designs are more likely to deliver the full range of co-benefits that nature finance increasingly demands.
How this informs belian.earth’s work
Restoration carbon projects often optimise for a single function. This paper, on which Chris was senior author, makes the case that biodiverse plantings deliver wider co-benefits, which matters for the nature finance and biodiversity-credit frameworks belian.earth increasingly works alongside.
Citation
Slade, E.M. et al. (2019). When Do More Species Maximize More Ecosystem Services?. Trends in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.06.014
Frequently asked questions
Why does maximising ecosystem services require high species diversity?
+
Research published in Trends in Plant Science found that no single species contributes to all ecosystem functions. Maximising multiple ecosystem services simultaneously requires greater species diversity than optimising any single function, because different species drive different processes. For forest carbon projects, this means that biodiverse restoration designs are more likely to deliver the full range of co-benefits that nature finance increasingly demands.
Related papers
Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species
Lars Gamfeldt et al.
Nature Communications, 2013
View on doi.org
The importance of species identity and interactions for multifunctionality depends on how ecosystem functions are valued
Eleanor Slade et al.
Ecology, 2017
View on doi.org
The value of biodiversity for the functioning of tropical forests: insurance effects during the first decade of the Sabah biodiversity experiment
Sean Tuck et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2016
View on doi.org
